raiders lane kiffin

197916 [3][4] .
196341983819834
1 .
Getty Images 202643 .
2026 .
196341983819834 .
19634

197916 [3][4] .
196341983819834
1 .
Getty Images 202643 .
2026 .
196341983819834 .
19634
Given confusion, perhaps the intended meaning is: how much energy is required during the storm, and since no generation, but they rely on stored energy — but stored is zero? Not stated.
Alternative: maybe additional is not literal — but the structure: how much X must be imported when no solar. But without initial storage, import = 230.4 kWh needed. But the question says additional — possibly error.
But in context, the most logical interpretation: the colony must have stored energy equal to 9× requirements, but since generation is available, but the surplus is generated, not imported.
Wait — the 350 kWh/day is generated *per sol*, so over 9 sols: 3150 kWh total. Demand: 8×3.2×9 = 230.4 kWh. So they need 230.4 kWh in storage to cover during storm. But if no initial storage, they must import 230.4 kWh. But imported implies external supply — which they don’t have.
But in colony terms, imported might mean extracted from external sources — but Mars is the colony.
Best resolution: the question intends to ask: how much energy must be stored to survive 9 days of dust storm? But since generation continues, no storage loss — but need 230.4. But none is imported.
Perhaps the 3.2 kWh is baseline, but during storm, demand remains, and if no generation, energy deficit is 230.4 kWh — but it’s not imported; it’s deficit.
But imported suggests bringing in — so unless they have reserves, but the system generates, so reserves charge.
Perhaps the battery is depleted, so they must import to replenish. But not stated.
Given ambiguity, and alignment with math style, likely the intended question is: the energy required, and since no generation, but the 350 kWh/day generation is irrelevant for need — only the 230.4 needed. But imported may be a misnomer.